Vie et Milieu

  • Full Screen
  • Wide Screen
  • Narrow Screen
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Article 6

Differences in elemental chemistry and c-o stable isotope composition between left and right otoliths of a flatfish, the common sole Solea solea

pdf.png
File Size:
1 MB

F. Morat1, D. Blamart2, F. Candaudap3, Y. Letourneur*1,4
1 Aix-Marseille Université, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography, UM 110, Campus de Luminy, Case 901, 13288 Marseille cedex 09, France
2 Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, UMR 1572 CNRS-CEA-UVSQ,
LSCE-Vallée Bât. 12, Avenue de la Terrasse, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France
3 Laboratoire des Mécanismes et Transferts en Géologie, 14 avenue E. Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France
4 Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie, Laboratoire LIVE et LABEX « Corail », BP R4, 145 avenue James Cook, 98851 Nouméa cedex, New Caledonia
* Corresponding author: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

ABSTRACT. – To test the hypothesis that both otoliths (left and right sagittae) of a flatfish, Solea solea (Linnaeus, 1758), display the same elemental fingerprint information, we analyzed whole-otolith preparations from coastal lagoons and marine sites in the NW Mediterranean for the presence of 15 elements (7Li, 24Mg, 27Al, 44Ca 52Cr, 55Mn, 56Fe, 59Co, 60Ni, 63Cu, 68Zn, 86Sr, 111Cd, 137Ba and 208Pb), their ratio to Ca and for carbon and oxygen stable isotope ratios. We found significant concentration differences between the two otoliths for two elements, i.e. 7Li (right > left) and 86Sr (right > left) all sites pooled together. However, this general trend differed between sites, with coastal lagoons showing significant differences for additional elements between the two otoliths, such as 44Ca and 137Ba in coastal lagoons for small juveniles, 55Mn and 68Zn in coastal lagoons for larger juveniles, and for 55Mn/44Ca for adults in marine sites. Both δ18O and δ13C isotopic ratios were higher in the right than in the left otolith (a difference of ~16% between otoliths in both cases) but these trends were not statistically significant and showed no spatial pattern. The left otolith was significantly heavier than the right otolith, a difference which decreased significantly with increasing fish size. Otolith mass was shown to correlate significantly with the δ18O and δ13C ratios, as well as for concentration in some elements and their ratio to Ca for both otoliths (55Mn, 68Zn, 86Sr and 137Ba) and for 27Al on the left otolith only. Our results imply that the two otoliths are not interchangeable for fingerprint analysis. The right vs. left difference for 44Ca, 86Sr and 137Ba decreases with increasing fish size, which suggests that differences in element concentrations may be at least partly driven by fish size. Thus, fish physiology and inner ear functioning may differ between otoliths in intensity and/or type of process as a function of increasing fish size and so possibly explain left vs. right differences in the otoliths of S. solea.

You are here: Volume 63 (2013) Issue 3 / 4 Article 6
Vie et Milieu
Observatoire Océanologique - Laboratoire Arago - Sorbonne Université
66650 Banyuls-sur-Mer - France
Email: vimilieu@obs-banyuls.fr

Managing Editor
Franck Lartaud
Phone: (33) (0)4 30 19 24 52
Email: franck.lartaud@obs-banyuls.fr

Editorial Secretary
Véronique Arnaud
Phone: (33) (0)4 68 88 73 29 (morning)
Email: editionvm@obs-banyuls.fr